Objection by the insurer
Insurers have argued that the law would drive up dental insurance premiums and could even drive smaller providers out of the market.
“At a time when people are struggling with inflation and other issues, they will be hit with higher premiums,” a No On 2 campaign spokesperson said.
But voters were not convinced by the avalanche of announcements from opponents.
“The level of support shown by Massachusetts voters — who approved of this at 71 percent — indicates how important this is,” said Chad Olsen, director of state government affairs at the ADA. “As evidence of the level of interest among dentists, we saw 49 state dental corporations contribute to the ‘yes’ vote initiative campaign to Question 2. Dentists nationwide know how important this reform is important to the patients they serve.”
The ADA fully supports advancing the medical loss rate as an important dental insurance reform nationwide, Olsen said, and the election outcome is a tremendous springboard for reform that patients want. clearly.
The changes, however, won’t take effect in Massachusetts for another two years, but Olsen said he expects similar measures to pop up in states across the country and meet with equal success.